Northeast Reader

Commentary about news, trends, and culture

  • Home
  • Blogs & Posts
  • Archive
  • Contributors
    • Lee Jones
    • Stephanie Jones
    • New Writers
  • About
    • Contact
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / What Would Real Detective Work in the Pelosi Case Look Like?

02 Nov 2022

What Would Real Detective Work in the Pelosi Case Look Like?

The attack on Paul Pelosi has dominated the news this week. It constitutes the ‘October surprise,’ although it’s unclear how much is forethought and how much is accidental and how much is an assumed opportunity on the part of Democrats. No one on the right is fooled and I see little evidence that anyone on the left even cares except the chatterati. What struck me from the onset was how twisted and improbable the main narrative sounded from the beginning. It wasn’t until Elon Musk strategically slipped the male hooker theory that it all started to make sense; not that that’s conclusive, but something is definitely not as per the official narrative. Leaving behind all the speculation, I’ll just focus on the huge lack of questions and answers being put forth or even sought by a lot of media. This may also apply to local and federal law enforcement except that they are probably under a gag order. This appears more certain each successive day. When there are elements reminiscent of a ‘Jesse Smollet’ type situation and half the country pursuing that line of reasoning, it should be incumbent upon all involved law enforcement to follow a much wider set of leads and to release factual findings to set the record straight. Let’s just say that lack is presently damning. 

Here are some questions that should be asked and the answers disseminated before anyone thinks this is solved. ‘Confessions’ by the defendant are not credible at face value when the victims and enablers were out the door in an hour to politicize the event on the national stage. They have seized their talking points on the front end, but what is learned on the back end [no pun intended] could come back to bite them.

The first set of question are from a Zero Hedge article, ‘Five Lingering Questions About The Bizarre Paul Pelosi Attack’. They are very good question but are reserved and don’t go far enough. My questions following are, in my estimation, just as important. 

  1. What was DePape’s true motivation?
  2. Who is the unidentified person that let law enforcement into the home the morning of the break in?
  3. Is it normal for glass to be on the outside of the home due to a forced entry into the home? 
  4. Was there security in or around the house the night of the incident?
  5. How was Paul able to take a bathroom break in the midst of an attack?

My additional questions:

  1. How long had Paul Pelosi been at the residence when the attack occurred?
  2. Where was Paul Pelosi prior to arriving at home?
  3. Is there video confirmation of Paul Pelosi’s timeline? 
  4. Is there video surveillance of DePape traveling to or arriving at the Pelosi address?
  5. What role did the third person play and what is the timeline of their presence at the home?
  6. What security measures are installed at the house, were they working at the time, if not, why? [This has subsequently been revealed to be an unmonitored government system, more questions should follow.]
  7. Exactly where did the hammer come from and at what point in the timeline was it revealed?
  8. Why was Paul Pelosi attacked and injured only when the police had arrived and were present? [as per news reports]
  9. Where is the police body cam footage and how much of the story details does it confirm? [The local police claim there is no interest in its disclosure. That bogus claim should be investigated.]
  10. Why was DePape in just his underwear, as has been reported [pending body cam footage]?

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Did you find this article helpful, informative or inspiring? Please share the link with at least one other person to beat the search engine algorithm that suppresses conservative views. Follow me on Twitter, @leestanNEreader to comment.

Thanks!

 

 

First time comments are submitted for approval. Once approved, further approval is not needed for subsequent conversation.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · Whitespace Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in