It’s time to elevate a threat from a vague rumored concept to a watch list; the subject is intentional large scale planned global depopulation. ‘What the hell is that?’ you might say. It’s the idea, currently being advanced in theory, by the climate apocalypse crowd, academics, and globalist, to find a way of radically reducing the population of the earth by several billion people to ‘save the earth’ from a purported climate change disaster that they claim to be imminent. To address the naysayers upfront here, you don’t have to launch into the conspiracy theory routine. I have no specific conspiracy theory to articulate. I only note what I observe. There are three parts to this: (one) what the depopulation advocates are saying themselves and the frequency with which they speak their words, (two) the amount of air time or audience is granted to their ideas by supposedly neutral media outlets, and (three) a process of identifying patterns by which similarly radical ideas went from crazy status to where any person of divergent thought was and must be persecuted. Pronouncements about evil movements follow a predictable pattern and tempo. It starts with radical academics who are initially scoffed at. It moves through greater academia and think tanks, NGOs (most often directly funded by your tax dollars). It’s then adopted by Silicon Valley, corporate leaders, legacy media, established religions. It’s embraced by political parties, sometimes by both sides, and finally by polarized segments of the electorate.
First, a random sampling of depopulation theory that has reached my ears via nationally distributed moderate/conservative news sites, conservative commentary, and posts on X (Twitter). Prior to the past 12-18 months, none. Since then, depopulation has been mentioned as an aspirational solution to ‘climate change’ by Klaus Schwab of the WEF, Bill Gates, and in the past month, by John Kerry, his daughter, and some professor currently trending on X. Of course, these individuals are only the highest profile advocates for depopulation crossing my limited consumption of news. The organizations and platforms that they associate with are the real gears for propagating the ideas they give fleeting reference to in public. Because the climate change agenda is presently facing some setbacks in various countries, it would be reasonable to suggest that depopulation is a newer, more desperate, but more forcefully advanced proposal to make up for the stall. Or it may be far more simple then that, in that genocide is a long-standing institution and practice in the quest for worldwide communism of which ‘climate change’ is just a proxy.
Clearly, depopulation has escaped the stodgy hoarder clutter of the deranged professor’s office. It’s baffling at first glance to grasp why high-profile public people, like Kerry and Gates for example, would be openly hinting at genocide. [I freely use this synonym as all the components of genocide are identical to any practical methods of population reduction] Sure, they hide behind things like pandemics as a fig leaf, even when its well documented that contemporary pandemics have been born in US funded Wuhan labs and the like, but they don’t care. Consider it an exercise in simultaneously forcing incredulity and desensitizing the public. ‘No one could possibly be evil enough to do something like this, could they?’ And, ‘I hear another million Africans died just last month. So sad. Too bad. Top off my coffee please.’ If you’re a media outlet and you’re incentivized by both a carrot (Bill Gates generously funds hundreds of media outlets), and a stick, to deliver the regime position on climate change, and all legacy media is thusly incentivized, then you are going to say what they what you to say about depopulation and you’re going to like it. It will begin with some messy blowback from a disgusted public, but these are patient people in control. They expect it and will wait until the public is repetitively and adequately numbed to the horror. Don’t worry, we’ll get used to it. In fact, eventually, way too many of us will pitch in and help dispose of the bodies someday. It doesn’t take long for history to repeat itself.
This is not a new template here, it has happened before, and it’s happening now. We conservatives typically drag out Stalin, Hitler, and Pol Pot as contemporary villains willing to kill millions for their ideology. There are even a few handfuls of people alive today that survived their purges, but these are all abstractions to anyone under 50 years old, maybe even 60. Today we could point to various ethnic purges in Africa and the Middle East but these are far too remote and foreign to Americans. We could look at the Chinese treatment of the Uyghurs as an example of widespread annihilation of an ethic group but that too is too far for us. Far fewer of us are familiar with what’s going on in Canada, pushing a euthanasia program, MAID, that has already gone far beyond the terminally ill, the old, those in great pain, and now encompasses youth, patients with generic psychological issues, and even indebtedness. It should be viewed as a progressively introduced genocide trial program, actively being deployed in an advanced Western ‘democracy’ and on mutual behalf of other similarly minded Western regimes.
The ultimate trial run was Covid. While it might be viewed as an embarrassing debacle of science run amok on a global scale, now that all the facts are coming out [just validated for some of us] and lies are being exhumed from our ruling regime, there is too much circumstantial evidence pointed toward development for a planned intentional release with the intent to kill large human populations, so we’ll see, the evidence is still coming in. As of April 2024, over 7 million people died globally from Covid, exceeding Hitler’s genocide totals. While large scale natural pandemics occur about every 100 years, a final disturbing truth should be noted of our present globalist idealist and their claim that the next even deadlier pandemic is already right around the corner at our doorstep. Of course it is; nothing could be more telling. They know this to be true because its already being perfected in the lab. They know you won’t believe this to be true because most of you refused to believe it in 2020 and some of you continue to refuse to believe now.
What do you do with an understanding of these patterns?
There is no ‘secret’ plot to depopulate the earth; they will openly declare their intension and it’ll be mostly ignored and or widely disbelieved. That pattern is already in play. Intensions will always be wrapped in some over-riding moral cause. Save the earth. Ease suffering. Right injustices. You will be conditioned not just to accept these causes, but also to embrace, promote and participate in them. There is no conspiracy, no secret.
As much as we try to wrap our heads around it, there is no tangible motive for the individual ‘masters of the universe’ to embrace eliminating a billion or more people from the face of the earth. Even ‘save the earth’ is an abstraction to them. There is no carefully calculated quantified cost benefit analysis that they could point to, to rationalize global mass murder. If you explained to them that a trillion trees were lost last year, but 2 trillion new ones were planted, it would make no difference to them, same with glacial loss and gain, oceans, weather, penguins. These are all means to an end. It isn’t really about the earth after all.
What do you do with this? Let’s just assume for a moment that this group of ultra-wealthy, ultra- powerful guys are sitting there with their twisted thoughts, divorced from reality and that their remarks about depopulation are idle musings that they have no power to execute them. Let’s assume they have no organization and that none of them got far richer from the Covid debacle. That they wouldn’t waste their money on thousands of think tanks, universities, and NGOs promoting their radical ideas. You can’t really assume these things unless you have your own head buried in the sand, can you? They validated the opposite of everything mentioned here during the Pandemic. They will let others do the dirty work and it might even be you if you’re forced to choose between right and self-interest and that of your family. Maybe world events will intervene and make all this a ‘lie’. Just don’t assume that it will, and it must; not when you can count tens of millions just in our lifetime that weren’t so lucky.
If you’d like to comment on this post, feel free to do so on Twitter. Follow me: @leestanNEreader