A day doesn’t go by now that inflation isn’t front and center of everyone’s concern. It’s quickly eroding your lifestyle on the one hand and on the other, your politicians are running scared from it because it’s going to radically alter the balance of power in a few short months. The two commodities most visibly affected are fuel and food. You pay a lot more for both now than you did a year and a half ago. While the two are certainly connected, food is a more visceral hit. If you had $200 per week in early 2021 to bring home what you wanted to eat and that provided little flexibility between basics and ‘treats’, then you’re now solidly into the no-treats zone; you’re changing the definition of basics. You’re probably coping by eating like you did before you got established at a certain comfort level. You eat less meat, maybe a lot less, you’re cut back on quantities, and you’re forced to buy lesser brands. I suspect a lot of people believe this is all just an unfortunate accident. Poor Joe got caught managing an economy during Putin’s itch to disrupt the world; definitely something inane like that. However, the real reasons may be a lot broader and insidious than just a big inflation whoopsies. There are multiple economic and political patterns headed your way, and those patterns will be intersecting very soon. Your food and your diet are in the crosshairs and may be targeted for permanent change.
I’m not a grand conspiracist but contrary to the bad rap they get, conspiracy theories are always something worthy of investigation. Some are true, some are not. Quite often, they’re true but only in the sense that individual threats of intent are not being guided by a single mastermind. Multiple opportunists smell the same scent and head that direction to exploit a matter. In the case of your food supply, I don’t care at this point how or if they are being guided, but I will ascertain that these trends are developing, and that they’re about to converge over your dinner plate.
The list of threatening effects on your food choices is changing, growing, and getting closer to home. The following is surely an incomplete list but with each one deserving further independent treatment. They are mentioned here only as an overview:
- As already mentioned, inflation, except that the Biden administration’s seeming indifference over food cost escalations may indicate something more than happenstance.
- An unusual number of fires and shutdowns at food production and processing sites.
- The declared objective of climate change activist that many food sources, especially meat and of that, especially beef, are detrimental to their climate objectives.
- That artificial substitutes with a much narrower nutrition base are being proposed and developed to replace naturally produced foods, especially meat.
- Bill Gates is involved as an activist and entrepreneur in all of the prior efforts to change the food supply and has bought 1% of total US farmland ostensibly as an ‘investment’ but certainly to also support his activism. Other super-wealthy are also following the same business plan.
- Farm production commodities such as fertilizer, diesel fuel, DEF fluid, farm equipment, and patented seed supplies are all manipulated by huge consortiums and multinational corporations that leave little incentive for any but the largest corporate farms to survive and ultimately force sell-outs of smaller muti-generational traditional farms.
- Insect based food is being promoted as a long-term answer to growing world population, (except that world population is expected to peak and start declining during this century.)
In 1932-1933, a mere 90 years ago, Joseph Stalin, the sole dictatorial leader of the Soviet Union, confiscated virtually all of the food produced from the Ukraine, at that time, a state within the orbit of Stalin’s government. It was done as an act of punishment for their nationalist ambitions. 3.9 million died.
Fast forward to 2022. In spite of inflation, world-wide shortages of fuel sparked by the next incursion of Russia into Ukraine, and a deliberate attempt to decrease the domestic fuel supply long term, Joe Biden has drained our strategic fuel reserve to levels not seen since the 80s and has sold 6 million barrels of that reserve to an adversarial China. Fuel is not food though it is certainly linked in the production cycle but compare and contrast this with Stalin’s treatment of Ukraine. Joe Biden represents the will of a cabal of other hidden handlers. He has widely proclaimed that it is his intention to quench fuel supply, raise prices and force Americans to accept climate change initiatives, even his own approval ratings be damned. What he is doing with fuel reflects what Joseph Stalin did with food. Based on the list of food threats listed above, there is evidence that food is either next on the list of planned privations or that it’s already been started. Getting rid of Joe Biden does not fix this, it is the will of his group of hidden handlers, likely led by front man Barack Obama.
Let’s ask a hypothetical question: What happens if Joe Biden starts selling strategic food reserves under the authority of executive powers? He’s doing it with fuel, absolutely a strategic resource, and we’re apparently not able to stop it; why would food be any different?
The reader here might be now inclined to call me a conspiracy theorist. Yes I am, and conspiracy theories are questions worthy of investigation. It’s too bad that those who’s traditional business was to be a professional skeptic, the press, are not in the same business. It’s not hard to connect the dots when you see all the responsible parties attend the same Davos or WEF conferences, listening to the same speeches by those that have openly published their aspirations. You’ll find most or all of these buried in the details of ‘climate change’ initiatives.
I can’t tell you for sure that some fat dumpy multi-billionaire that flies around the world in a private jet and has estates on four continents, I can’t tell you that they personally want to make the portion on your dinner place tonight smaller or that they’ll have you drinking ‘Soylent Green’ in a few years, but these are the near and far consequences of what they do openly declare. I can say for absolutely certain, that they do have a high investment in your compliance to their choices for your governance and in that, food becomes a serious and significant weapon. In the meantime, I must strongly recommend that we stop treating food news as a tertiary importance and start looking at it with the same urgency that we view fuel, inflation, second amendment issues, and immigration. When our national food supply and food reserves dry up in a short time frame, you aren’t getting it back for a long time.